On March 6, Sevastopol gauleiter Mikhail Razvozhaev announced “the confiscation of movable and immovable property owned by legal entities and individuals, including foreign ones, into state ownership of Sevastopol.”
Among other things, it was stated that such companies as “Mayak Ship Lighting Plant”, “Ship Lighting Plant”, “Plosk”, “Tinos”, “Technotron Operating Organization”, “Technical Operation Center No. 1” and the “Korpus” production cooperative were “nationalized”.
Razvozhaev stated that the owners of these structures allegedly “collected funds and financed Ukrainian armed groups, and were directly the leaders and sponsors of the Polish “human rights” foundation “Open Dialogue”, which poses a threat to the constitutional order, defense capability and security.”
Accordingly, among the individuals who fell under the repression of the occupiers, Razvozhaev declared Andrey and Irina Karpenko, Petr, Sidonia, Sergey and Lyudmila Kozlovskys, Elena Miroshnikova (Kozlovskaya), Viktor Miroshnikov, Natalya Sebyakina, Olga and Evgeny Rubezhny, Vladimir Prisyazhnyuk and Taisiya Ukrainskaya.
This story is quite remarkable in that several years ago the aforementioned Open Dialogue Foundation and its main activist, Lyudmila Kozlovskaya, were accused of covertly working for the Russian special services.
The accusations were based on the fact that her brother Petr’s business, including that registered to his mother Sidonia and his other sister Elena Miroshnikova, operates in occupied Sevastopol, including working for the Russian military machine.
Among other things, “Russian passports” of these individuals were posted on social networks; in the “registers” of the occupiers, Petr Kozlovsky is indeed listed as the “founder”, for example, of the aforementioned “Plosk”.
Lyudmila Kozlovskaya, among other things, had a long-term public conflict with the former Polish authorities, who deported her to Ukraine in 2018, and the main public work of the Open Dialogue Foundation was lobbying in the structures of the EU, the Council of Europe and the OSCE for the interests of a number of individuals from post-Soviet countries, including big business, as victims of authoritarian regimes.
This, at a minimum, caused a sharp reaction from the former authorities of Moldova and Kazakhstan.
It is obvious that the case of this foundation, which the occupiers “suddenly” remembered, will now probably receive new details, and we only have to point out Taisiya Ukrainskaya, mentioned by the gauleiter, in the context of the Kozlovskys family.
Just a couple of days ago we wrote about this person, mentioned in a long-running dispute between the occupiers’ “Department of land and property relations” of the occupiers and a number of “tenants” regarding the “Mys Sarych” Recreation Center.
As we indicated, these “tenants” are connected through Vladimir Gelvanovsky and Vladimir Nigar with the Sevastopol-located Fish Canning plant “Aquamarine”, as a key link in the chain of the international fish mafia. What exactly the Razvozhaev clan could have had to disagree with these people will probably be revealed in the near future.
