In early March, the aggressor-controlled “Sevastopol media” began to savor another round of a long litigation between the “department of land and property relations” of the occupiers and the “firm” “Recreation center “Mys Sarych”.
Now it has resulted in another “decision of the arbitration court of Sevastopol city” dated February 24. The essence of this “case of the century” comes down to a land lease agreement from 2003, which clearly “ceased to suit” the illegal “administration”.
Apparently working for the “relevant needs of the administration”, the Sevastopol “sharks of the pen” have now “significantly stated” that “three dozen people (including very respected ones) are mentioned among the participants in the arbitration on the case of the recreation center”, including not only residents of Sevastopol, Crimea and Russians, but also people from “Odesa, Kyiv and Kharkov”.
In this “decision”, indeed, among other “interested persons” are mentioned allegedly Kharkov residents Vladimir Kamratov and Olga Fedorova, Odessans Irina Shandrik and Yuriy Yuritsyn, as well as Kiev residents Irina Karpenko, Taisiya Ukrainskaya and Natalia Ukrainskaya.
But first it is worth understanding which “respected people” the Sevastopol propagandists of the aggressor had in mind. In the occupiers’ “registers” the “Trading House “Kupechesky”, the firm “Intertech”, as well as Vladimir Stepanenko and Vladimir Gelvanovsky are mentioned among the “founders” for “Mys Sarych”.
Accordingly, in the structure “Kupechesky” the “founders” are declared to be Alina and Vyacheslav Verkhodanov, and the Sevastopol firm “Intertech” prior to the occupation was registered to Yuri Vlasov. And for the occupiers, the “founders” of “Intertech” are Lyudmila and Alexey Onishchenko.
And, in addition to the aforementioned “Mys Sarych”, this “firm” “co-founded” the structure “Service-Technology”, together with the “firm” “Aelita”. At the same time, the aforementioned “Intertech”, “Service-Technology” and “Aelita” have a common email in the “registers” of the occupiers , and Vladimir Gelvanovsky, an old figure in our investigations, was declared as the “co-founder” in “Aelita”.
As we wrote in 2021, after the beginning of the occupation, “in Russian jurisdiction” Vladimir Gelvanovsky and Vladimir Nigar “registered” the “Aquamarine” Fish Cannery”, which indicated on the products distributed in the occupied territory the place of “registration” of Nigar as an “entrepreneur”, on Bolshaya Morskaya Street, where several other “fish” companies were “registered”.
Before the occupation, Gelvanovsky was a deputy of the Sevastopol City Council from the “Party of Regions”, and, according to the Internet, he “supervised” fish catching and processing enterprises under the patronage of the head of the Sevastopol police, Major General Vitaly Malikov, the son-in-law of the former Minister of Internal Affairs of Ukraine Nikolai Belokon.
Occupiers’ propaganda, as part of the “intraspecific struggle”, attributed Gelvanovsky’s participation in organized crime under the patronage of Lev Mirimsky and in transactions with the Tavrika bank, which was finally liquidated in 2016, but no consequences for this businessman from the occupiers’ punishers have been noticed over the past decade.
We wrote that Mr. Gelvanovsky’s “business talents” are at least variability-based, since dry cleaners, hotels, ship repair and electrical engineering enterprises, and, in particular, “Interrybflot”, were “registered” in his name in Russian “registers”.
This same enterprise, as well as “Interrybflot-Crimea”, has the same Vladimir Nigar as a “co-owner”, and these structures are actually used as a front for freight (charter or bareboat charter) for fishing vessels. We already wrote then that these formal owners of “factories and steamships” have been regularly attending “Sevastopol court hearings” since 2015 in a number of lawsuits over the “Mys Sarych” recreation center.
We wrote that a number of companies are also registered to Nigar as the alleged “owner”. These include the aforementioned “fish” enterprises and the similar in purpose “Interprom” with Krasnodar registration, as well as the Sevastopol “companies” in the real estate sector “Most-S”, “Service-Technology”, “SKK”. Moreover, Nigar was listed as the “founder” of “Krym-Moscow-Stroy”, which spent a very long time building the “Sea Breeze” residential complex on Sevastopol’s Stepanyana Street.
Now it is worth adding that Nigar was also declared by the occupiers as the “chairman of the non-profit organization” “Association of Participants of the Free Economic Zone of Sevastopol”. Thus, the case of the “Mys Sarych” recreation center clearly reflects the activities of the international fish mafia, about whose metastases on the Ukrainian mainland and in third countries, for example, in Belarus, we wrote earlier.
And therefore, the alleged “tenants” of this base from Odesa, Kyiv and Kharkov mentioned in the “arbitration decisions” are worth a separate analysis. Kharkov resident Vladimir Kamratov is not very public, but in Ukrainian registers he is noted as the founder of the Sevastopol company “Exel” for shipbuilding and ship repair, and the “namesake” of the aforementioned “tenant” Olga Fedorova is the owner of the “Symbol” trademark, which started a business in Kharkov back in 1997, which has grown to allegedly “22 boutiques in Dnepr, Odessa and Kyiv”.
The aforementioned Kyiv residents Ukrainskayas do not appear in open sources, and Irina Karpenko is an individual entrepreneur, with a Kyiv registration address that coincides with the one indicated in the “arbitration decisions”.
The most interesting, especially considering the previously described activities of “Aquamarine” in Belgorod-Dnestrovsky, are the Odesa “tenants” in “Mys Sarych”, since Irina Shandryk is the wife of the former deputy head of Odesa, Vyacheslav Shandryk, who once headed the Southern Department of Capital Construction of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine.
And the aforementioned Yuri Yuritsyn, allegedly living in Odesa on Babushkina Street next to Shandryk, has long been mentioned in the Ukrainian press as an “accomplice in the scams” of Shandryks, among other things, on the credit union “Istok” and the company “Istok-2001”.
It is noteworthy that in 2017, Yuritsyn was allegedly kidnapped in Odesa by some bandits in order to receive a large ransom. It is interesting that in a number of previous “Sevastopol arbitration decisions” the litigants demanded to “exclude from the list of tenants” the above-mentioned Kyiv women and Shandryk also, but not Yuritsyn.
And in the “registers” of the occupiers since 2015, Yuri Yuritsyn is listed as the “founder” of the “hunting company” “Krodessos” and the “company” for the production of soft drinks “Zhemchuzhina-2015” in Simferopol, while in the “hunting” structure he is associated with a certain Alexander Ukrainsky, the “namesake” of the above-mentioned Kyiv women, and Yuritsyn is not declared by the occupiers as any “foreigner” according to these companies.
Thus, at least the Odesa trace of the international fish mafia, associated with the Sevastopol fish canning plant “Aquamarine” requires additional, in-depth analysis.
