As it was expected, the Russian special services do not miss the opportunity to make maximum “noise out of nothing” around the 80th anniversary of the Yalta Conference of 1945. However, at the “reporting events” that were held and planned, they lack “the smallest thing”, namely, representatives of third countries with whom the aggressor is allegedly “about to conclude” a new “Yalta deal”.
For example, at the “video bridge” with Moscow held in occupied Simferopol on February 3, the invaders were able to present only such “talking heads” as the inveterate “museum worker of the Russian world” Andrei Malgin, known in Europe and the USA only for his complicity in the looting of works of art in Kherson by the aggressor in 2022, as well as the “vice-rector of the Crimean Federal University” Andrei Yurchenko.
Among their Moscow counterparts, such seasoned agents of the Russian intelligence service from the infamous “Russian military-historical society” as Mikhail Myagkov and Alexey Plotnikov were presented at this show.
And if a couple of years ago the Kremlin directors managed to pull out some European professors as “free ears” to the rants of these figures about the “great victory” and “new world order”, now only Crimean collaborators had to listen to the revelations of Muscovites about the “new Nuremberg Tribunal” and “division of the world between Russia, India and China”.
The “level of discussion” of the next “masters of the world’s destinies” here illustrates the “key question” of this event – whether the occupiers should rename Roosevelt Street in Yalta or not.
The corresponding “profound reflections” of Yurchenko, who, by the way, made his career under the “Ukrainian nationalists” by publishing books, including about Soviet totalitarianism, contrast maximally, among other things, with his 2010 publication about the Yalta Conference.
At that time, Yurchenko spoke not only about the harshness of the totalitarian system of the USSR, but also quoted the participants of the 1945 event, that “the conference of the three powers is a very privileged club”, where the “entrance fee” is equal to “5 million soldiers or the corresponding equivalent”.
It is obvious that today, even if someone decided to demand and accept such contributions from the Kremlin regime, then the Russian regime clearly has nothing to present.
And so the Kremlin propagandists still have such “fragments of former glory” up their sleeves as greasy stooges like Malgin, as well as “mind-boggling” threats to the world community to “tear down the monument to the 32nd President of the United States” in occupied Crimea if “Trump behaves badly.”
