The aggressor-controlled “Sevastopol media” disseminated another propaganda in the form of a sugary text “Mariupol through the eyes of Sevastopol residents”, presented as the alleged “story of a reader” by Svetlana Malakhatko. In addition to splashes of “delight” about the aggressor’s fighters flying over her head and statements that for local residents “life has become better”, “despite the curfew, sometimes the lack of water and electricity”, and the fact that “they can go out into the fields and even onto the side of the road dangerous to life”, this publication has a fairly specific purpose.
And this is not a story about the fact that “there are many boarded up windows in abandoned cultural centers and government institutions” because, supposedly, “they were closed many years ago”, and it is not a complaint about the fact that “there is no active cohesive work yet in the private sector” , and that “when it will start is still unknown”. The essence of this so-called “reader’s story” is to “explain a simple fact”: in Mariupol “there are very few people on the streets, it was striking that little children are not visible at all”.
Therefore, it is through Malakhatko, who is in fact not a “reader” at all, but an old accomplice of Sevastopol collaborators, including the Chaly family, who are promoting a fake about a certain Mariupol “boarding school”, in which allegedly “militants of a neo-Nazi formation held training camps to select schoolchildren to join their groups”, with “children left without parents”. Let us remind that there is no evidence of children participating in the defense of Mariupol, and over the past two years, no “neo-Nazi schoolchildren” have been fabricated by the “more serious” occupiers’ propaganda.
The reason for the current fuss “from Malakhatko” is simple: in fact, thousands of mainland children, including those with parents killed by the Russian aggressor, passed through Sevastopol in 2022, and then we directly wrote not only about criminal “adoptions” but also about black transplantology in the occupiers’ military hospital there. The Sevastopol collaborators will have to answer for all these genocidal atrocities, they understand this, and the recent sanctions for a number of the “officials” involved have become a definite “incentive to action” for them. The recent Oscar for the Ukrainian documentary about the defense of Marupol also aroused the impotent anger of the “Pied Pipers”.
However, the weapon of the newly-minted “Pied Pipers of Hammel” in the form of Malakhatko looks extremely sad; apparently, in the field of provocations in the field of the Black Sea ecosystems and global warming, for which the aggressor’s special services had previously prepared her, she would not have looked so tragicomic.
