After the Russian occupiers undermined the Kakhovka hydroelectric power station on the night of June 6 and the obvious consequences of this for the occupied Crimea, the aggressor’s propaganda began to try to “correct the situation” and it looked traditionally tragicomic.
The criminal “governor” of the occupied Sevastopol, Mikhail Razvozhaev, stated that allegedly “the damage to the Kakhovka hydroelectric power station will not affect the city’s water supply” at the same time urging “to trust only official sources of information”, which is traditionally a sign of serious problems for Sevastopol residents.
Razvozhaev’s Crimean “colleagues” have so far decided to “not notice” the situation, and the criminal “head of administration” of Nova Kakhovka decided to “take the rap” for them, “profoundly” stating that “there is no threat of dehydration of the North Crimean Canal, the head station of the North Crimean Canal is located higher dams”.
Such fantastic “knowledge” in melioration and land reclamation aroused sarcasm even among the rabid propagandists of the Kremlin, who sarcastically stated: “we hope that we managed to download enough volume for rice and other exercises”.
However, the most “stable” position was taken by the Melitopol “talking head” of the occupiers Vladimir Rogov, pointing out that allegedly “the destruction of the valves of the Kakhoska hydroelectric power station does not represent any critical danger for the Zaporizhzhya NPP yet”, and that in general “there was no explosion at the station”.
At the same time, ARC expert Olexiy Plotnikov pointed out that the explosion of the hydroelectric power station should be qualified as a gross violation of Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions, that is, as a war crime.
ARC expert Professor Babin pointed out the strategic risks from undermining and discharging huge volumes of water in a short time for the extremely vulnerable ecology of the Black Sea with its hydrogen sulfide layer.
