Since mid-January, the hype around the Feodosia-located “More” “plant”, seized by the aggressor, has not stopped in the occupiers-controlled “media”.
A “group of excursionists” was even brought to the occupiers-controlled “enterprise”, including the henchman of the criminal Konstantinov, the invaders’ illegal “head of the state council committee” Oksana Dobrorez and the same fake “acting minister of industrial policy” Elena Elekchan.
The illegal “plant management”, namely Oleg Flusov and Anton Korzun, scattered in the promises of a certain “bright future” for the “More” in this uncomplicated show, emphasizing its illegal inclusion in the aggressor’s “United Shipbuilding Corporation”.
Once again, it was promised to “launch” two long-suffering “Kometa 120M”, which in fact had long been “laid up” due to sanctions, and it was also mentioned such supposedly “breakthrough successes” as the construction of a “bomb-laying boat” and “seven ships –targets”.
However, in fact, the “target” of all these “visits” and “optimistic publications” was quite different. Fake “chiefs” of the “More” and their criminal “management” from St. Petersburg started “modernization of production facilities and lifting complex”, including such a tasty thing for any “director and accountant” as “dredging”.
They are planning to “dredge” in 2023 the criminal costs of the aggressor’s “state program” of “Development of the military-industrial complex”.
At the same time, the criminal “shipbuilders” call the current crisis in the aggressor’s oil transportation, caused both by the Russia’s aggression and the sanctions that followed it, as the main argument of this epic in the style of “give me money, give money to me”.
As “Rosmorrechflot” stated, in order to “ensure the independence” of the aggressor from “foreign carriers”, “only” “about 200 tankers” are needed. Well, on the “More” they naturally declare “readiness to help” in this “little problem”, but, of course, “later”, after the “dredging”.
In principle, the calculation of the criminal “shipbuilders” is simple here – with the current prospects for the de-occupation of Crimea, they can promise the Kremlin, in principle, anything, since the reasons for not fulfilling the promise will be obvious.
