As Russian propagandists “modestly” stated after waiting “for courage” for several days, in Tashkent, in the office of the aggressor “Rossotrudnichestvo” actively used by the aggressor’s special services, on March 17, a kind of fake “round table” was held “on the preservation of historical memory in relation to the deported peoples and state support their revival and development”.
The aggressor’s propaganda stated that the “table” was allegedly held on the “initiative of the activists of the Crimean Tatar diaspora of Uzbekistan”. It allegedly involved “scientists, public and religious figures”, as well as the criminal “leadership of the Crimean state committee for interethnic relations” from the Russian invaders, and Russian “diplomats”, both “under the roof” of the “apparatus of defense attaché” in Tashkent, and Moscow-located “information-analytical center for the study of socio-political processes in the post-Soviet space”.
However, on the photo report from the “table” one could see just the faces of the mentioned Russian military intelligence officers, as well as, in the “picture on the screen” mode, the permanent Georgyi Muradov and Ayder Tippa, but it’s just the Crimean Tatars themselves from Uzbekistan didn’t hit “in the frame”. Russian propagandists did not even manage to name the names of these so-called “Crimean Tatars”, because in reality, of course, no authoritative Crimean Tatar figures from Uzbekistan took part in the “event”.
This is a fairly predictable situation, since even earlier the aggressor’s special services could not find anyone who could convincingly play the role of the “Crimean Tatar friend of the Kremlin from Tashkent” and against this background they manipulated a certain imam from the Chirchik region of Uzbekistan, Lenur Abdulganiev.
In this format, new aggressor’s provocations in the countries of Central Asia are not ruled out, and not only as part of the search for imaginary “friends”, but also fabrication of charges against “local Crimean Tatar extremists and terrorists”, with the hands of those very “attaches” of the aggressor inciting interethnic and interreligious strife.
