As we previously reported, in recent weeks a group of collaborators under the control of certain Russian special services has become more active, spreading “compromising materials” on the criminal “head of Crimea” Sergey Aksyonov and his cronies. At the same time, they even announced an “anti-Aksyonov” “protest meeting” in Russia-occupied Simferopol on December 17.
Without the Russian punishers’ “powerful support”, such an adventure would have been too risky, but now, perhaps, the “storm in a glass”, initiated by them has somewhat “settled down”. Puppet “protesters” spread a “statement” that the fake “rally is postponed” on the “telegram channel network”, used by them.
At the same time, they began to blame Aksyonov’s criminal “advisor” Oleg Kryuchkov, notable for the fact that he recently announced an alleged “assassination” being prepared for him, for the “disruption of the event”. At the same time, the Kremlin’s mouthpiece, the criminal “TASS” published Aksyonov’s “extensive interview” on December 15 as a kind of symbol of “tsar’s favor”.
However, the greatest interest in this process is caused by a certain “letter” of the criminal “state committee for water management and land reclamation” dated December 9, which was recently published in the mentioned “protesters’ network”. In it, the occupiers claim some possibility “by 2025” to allegeldy bring the level of Crimean lands irrigated by the North Crimean Canal to 124,000 hectares, but under “a number of conditions”.
The point here is not that “2025” and “never” are already obvious synonyms for the occupiers’ “authorities”, and not that in 2013, at least 137 thousand hectares were irrigated in Crimea from the Canal.
The bottom line is that after the illegal “launch of the canal” the same Aksyonov reported on the alleged “as much as” 25,000 hectares illegally irrigated from the Canal in 2022, and also this summer he criminally promised to “irrigate in 2023” 44,000 hectares, and in some “perspectives” to bring this figure up to 90 thousand, which clearly does not coincide with the “meliorators’ figures”.
In this way, the fake “protesters” obviously want to emphasize the incompetence of the criminal “head of Crimea” in the issues of land reclamation and destruction of the peninsula’s water management, which are so “painful” for the Kremlin’s propaganda. However, in practice this means that the real problems of land reclamation and melioration have to be solved by the Ukrainian authorities after the de-occupation of Crimea.
