As the Association has already written, the Crimean collaborators decided to “stretch out” the prospect of the criminal “allocation of land plots” previously promised by the Kremlin in the occupied Crimea for the criminal “veterans” of Russian aggression, announcing the fake “adoption of a republican law”.
At the same time, the “technical aspects” of the illegal “allocation” and the fake “queue for the plots” were descended in this “act” to fictitious “local administrations” at the “place of residence of the corpse”, and the criminal “republican government” simply “washed its hands”.
However, even in this propaganda “procedure”, the collaborators “clarified” that they allegedly “will owe” the “land plots” only to the aggressor’s “cannon fodder”, “registered” on the occupied peninsula until February 24, 2022, but without any gradations of “Crimean military personnel”, but by the very fact of their criminal participation in aggression.
The fact that authors of this fake “Simferopol law” still tried to write according to some of their own, albeit criminal logic, obviously “pissed off” the Kremlin. Immediately after the fake “adoption of the Crimean law” on these “land allotments”, Putin signed the criminal “prescript № 412-рп” on the same issue, in which he outlined a “completely different approach”.
This criminal “prescript” requires allocating land for “veterans” in the occupied Crimea, Sevastopol, as well as in the Russia’s Moscow Oblast, while the sign of the fake “right to land” is not the previous place of residence of Russian aggression’s corpse or invalid, but only his criminal uncertain “military merit”.
Such a purely “imperial” approach, in the spirit of the mythical “granting lands to the Roman legionaries” to form a “loyal population for the colonies” as well as for their capital, puzzled even the ultra-chauvinists of the aggressor with a minimal propensity for arithmetic.
Firstly, it is obvious that several hundred thousand Kremlin soldiers have already passed through the meat grinder of Russian aggression, and for all of them there will certainly not be any illegal “Crimean land plots”.
Secondly, it is absolutely incomprehensible why, in principle, a conditional Russian disabled person or a corpse’s family needs a certain land plot in the occupied Crimea, especially in cases where he (they) either does not have the tools and costs for such criminal colonization, or has no desire to move “to nowhere” from their Russian region living with a tolerable climate and, so far, a tolerable economy.
And thirdly, most of the lands in the Crimea are not seaside landscapes, but rather difficult-to-use farmlands, from where the “Russian colonialists” deserted twice en masse only in the 20th century.
Thus, the Kremlin’s criminal promises to its “legionnaires” turned out to be naked propaganda in the style of “imperial paranoia”, even more remote from reality than the fakes of its Simferopol puppets.
