The “Crimean officialdom” of the aggressor decided to “delight” the population with a wave of messages about another “fateful event”, this time in the form of the “first international economic forum “New Silk Road”, held on October 25 via “teleconference” from Yalta with some “Chinese guests” and “representatives of Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan and a number of Russian regions”.
The identities of the “foreign participants” are naturally hidden by the aforementioned propaganda, and such “economists and businessmen” as Anastasia Gridchina and Georgy Muradov were noticeable among the organizers’ “talking heads”.
Like the previous pseudo-Chinese events of the Russian special services in Crimea, the “logistics” of the aforementioned “forum” was entrusted to the Moscow “fund for the promotion of cultural and economic ties “Soyuz”, with the denomination in the form of Viktor Vesna.
This collaborator also distinguished himself as the “founder of Crimean firms”, such as Sevastopol’s “Tavrika” and Simferopol’s “Medbiotekhnologiya” and “Tess Tour Crimea”.
Earlier, we wrote about the scams carried out by Russian intelligence through Vesna, in the form of “commercial import” of unsuccessful professors from Genoa to Crimea or fake “Chinese investors” in the Simeiz sanatorium.
In April of this year, Vesna, together with the then “economists and managers”, Efim Fiks and Yuri Gempel, distinguished himself with a scandal with previous “Chinese investors”, in the form of fake “director of the Chinese Infrastructure Construction Group” Kui Zhao and “director of the department of international cooperation and translator” of this group Andrei Shi.
Now it has been announced that the Vesna fund has signed a certain “memorandum of cooperation”, allegedly with the “Technopark of Economic and Technological Cooperation (Urumqi, Xinjiang Province)”.
Is it any wonder that there is no information in open sources about this structure, as well as about the “Chinese Infrastructure Construction Group”. Since the curators of the current “Yalta Forum” promise to make it an annual event, they clearly plan to come up with new loud names for non-existent “Chinese counterparties” in the future.

Similar Posts