Earlier we already told about the “last hope for Trump”, that was broadcasted a couple of weeks ago by the “Crimean media”.
Then, with reference to the yellow press and all sorts of “Washington insiders” of the Vietnam War period, key collaborators promised allegedly “official recognition of Crimea as Russian territory”, however, in this matter, predictably, “something went wrong”.
And now, having hastily “cut their appetites”, the same “Crimean media” decided to tell “at least” about the “prospects for easing sanctions”, which “for some reason” turned out to be not as useful for the aggressor’s economy as the same “media” had been confidentially telling the population all these past years.
Professor of the Moscow State Law Academy Benjamin Shakhnazarov was brought in as an “expert-sanctionologist” for that scam.
Answering the question about which sanctions “mostly hinder Crimea’s development,” this figure named energy, civil aviation, settlement operations, technology transfer, and intellectual property protection.
At the same time, the propagandists did not care in principle that this corporate lawyer has nothing common with the occupied peninsula, and that the importance of energy issues or new technologies for the current “Crimean silicon trough,” where the “new glass factory” has been talked about as an impossible dream for two years in a row, is, to put it mildly, questionable.
In fact, Shakhnazarov clearly conveyed “in Crimean sauce” the interests of large Russian capital regarding sanctions, which “especially hinder” the enrichment of oligarchs close to the Kremlin, often at a decent distance from the occupied territories.
As for the tragicomic realities of the Crimea, it is worth mentioning the fresh “confession through clenched teeth” in the same “Crimean press”, though not on such a pathetic occasion, but concerning such “trifles” as the almost doubling of the price of potatoes, which are gradually turning into an “exquisite delicacy” on the peninsula.
As it “suddenly turned out”, one of the key reasons for the crop failures of this “especially demanding vegetable” in recent years has been the shortage of imported seeds, without which, “with reliance on especially productive Russian varieties”, the occupiers, due to the local harvest, “for some reason” only cover a third of the Crimean demand.
Let us recall, that until 2014, the peninsula covered local consumption of potatoes with its own harvest, and Crimean residents could probably imagine anything in their lives, but not a shortage of potatoes and ther even often “allowed themselves to pick and choose” in its varieties decade ago.
