As the criminal “policemen” of the aggressor’s terrorist group in Donetsk stated on March 3, they “detained as a suspect – the head of an organized criminal group” an active Crimean collaborator Vadim Pogodin.
The terrorists stated that “in 2014, a 52-year-old suspect with other members of an organized crime group, by prior agreement, kidnapped a teenager, severely beat him, took him outside the city and shot him.”
Let us recall that in 2014 Pogodin was an assistant to the terrorist Igor Strelkov and “commanded” under his command the criminal “battalion” “Kerch” and really personally took part in the execution of a sixteen-year-old schoolboy Stepan Chubenko from Kramatorsk.
Further, Pogodin was in the occupied Crimea, and in 2017, the press secretary of the then Prosecutor General Yuriy Lutsenko, Larisa Sargan, tried to PR that the occupiers “even” sent Pogodin to a “pre-trial detention center”. However, further Pogodin, after the occupiers predictably did not succeed in fabricating the fake “cooperation between the Prosecutor General’s Office of Ukraine and Crimea”, was released by the occupiers.
Further, since December 2019, Pogodin “surfaced” in the occupied Sevastopol, where he “entered the cage” of the criminal governor Razvozhaev, became a “frequent guest of a talk show on local television” and was associated with the illegal “company” “Restoration Technologies”, actively developing “budgets ”on a fake “restoration” of Sevastopol buildings.
Then the restorers accused the “contractors” of “changing the historical appearance of the stairs of the “Pobeda” cinema, poor-quality repair of the retaining wall on Lazarev Square and the destruction of small architectural forms”. However, it is obvious that both Pogodin’s Sevastopol “architectural adventures” and his murder of a teenager in 2014 in itself are of little concern to Donetsk terrorists.
In fact, Pogodin is interesting to Donetsk punishers in their “business conflicts” with Razvozhaev’s structures, as well as, and this is most likely their main motive, as a form of “bringing to account” and, accordingly, eliminating Strelkov (Girkin) himself, who is rather inconvenient for a number of “Kremlin persons”.
The terrorist Girkin has already publicly reacted extremely nervously to the sending of his “subordinate” Pogodin “to the basement” by his current Donetsk “competitors”.
