Earlier, we wrote more than once about the Russian occupiers’ military intelligence puppet, the so-called “blogger” Eyvaz Umerov, through whom the last two months have been actively thrown “compromising evidence” on the Crimean Tatar collaborators close to the criminal “head of Crimea”, including the “mufti” of Crimea Emirali Ablayev and his henchmen, mostly allegedly about their “Turkish connections”.
In recent days, apparently in conjunction with the conditional “group” of Natalia Poklonskaya and her sister, the illegal “head” of Uyutne village Elena Osadcha, previously “employed” by the occupiers in the criminal clone of “Chernomorneftegaz”, Umerov, on the obvious instructions of his “curators”, began to distribute “various information”, already – directly about the fake “head of Crimea” Sergey Aksyonov, according to “land schemes” near the same Uyutne and Yevpatoria.
Obviously, this “blogger” was given some “guarantees”, but they may “not work for some reason”. It is reported that in the approach of the “arrest”, associated with Umerov’s repeated previous assaults, they “suddenly” decided to “make him a martyr”, for which the collaborator defiantly went to a “single picket” in front of the building of the aggressor-controlled fake “Crimean government” after which he predictably allegedly received “ten days of arrest”.
It is predictable that in such a development of events, Umerov immediately became a “black sheep” for other aggressor-controlled “bloggers”, feeding from the hands of the Aksyonov’s clan and his “roof’, including the FSB punishers. For example, the infamous propagandist Talipov immediately began to spread all sorts of unflattering “revelations” about Umerov as a “sick man” and to describe, with great knowledge of the matter, Umerov’s plundering of the criminal so-called “aid” to the military structures of the aggressor.
In this context, it is noteworthy that the Aksyonov-close “media” began to point to the connection between Umerov and another Russian invaders’ allegedly “discarded card”, Ruslan Balbek, who also often acted together with Poklonskaya. It is also indicated that Balbek may be planning an “urgent departure to Turkey”. Therefore, it is possible that the purpose of this combination of Russian special services may be not only a “storm in a glass” regarding Aksyonov, but also the “withdrawal” to Turkey of allegedly “Crimean Tatar oppositionists”, allegedly “offended by the Kremlin” according to the fictitious “opposition to the regime” scheme, standard for the aggressor .
Therefore, Umerov’s “revelations” on the alleged “Turkish connections of the Muftiate” and the corresponding “embezzlement, abuse and influence of Gülen” may not be accidental and may be aimed not so much at the “Crimean audience” as at certain “ears” to the south of the occupied Crimea with which, obviously bypassing the authorities in Ankara, Moscow criminally wants to “build bridges”.
What exactly they want to “bring as a gift” along with the fake “oppositionists”, controlled by the Russian special services, is not completely clear, but this clearly should go beyond the usual gossip about Crimean mosques and have a significant “material expression”.
