After the “big water” that flooded a number of Sevastopol villages on January 19 receded, and after muddy water began to appear in the houses of the townspeople, who had sarcastically discussed gauleiter Razvozhaev’s statements about “secret water pipelines,” social networks were filled with more plausible versions of the “flood with dehydration”, than the stories told by the occupiers about “ramming the waterworks with logs”.
Individual Crimean collaborators “helped” the Sevastopol residents with this, namely the fake “head of the department of hydrology and hydrological forecasts of the Hydrometeorological Center of Crimea” Natalya Okhremenko, who told a number of details, and most importantly, numbers and dates on the incident. Most likely, this “sudden frankness” became a “Parthian arrow” to the same Razvozhaev from the Aksyonov’s bandit clan, about which the “white bone” of the Sevastopol colonialists has been demonstratively wiping its feet in front of the Kremlin for the last two years, but the motives for leaking this information did not reduce the intensity of passions during its discussion.
The fact is that a sharp melting of snow in the mountains and especially in the foothills began across the entire peninsula from January 18, but a catastrophic flood occurred only in Sevastopol. As Okhremenko stated, referring to her “subordinates” who “returned from Sevastopol, so I received information first-hand” and “visited the most affected villages, including Honcharne and Sakharna Holovka, and inspected hydrological posts on the rivers”, “the floods were significant, although not the largest. It was even stronger”, which clearly contradicts the stories of the “Sevastopol governor” about the “unprecedented disaster”.
Okhrimenko named the real reason for the collapse as the delay in releasing water from the Chernorechenske Rreservoir until the situation of January thunderstorms, when in the middle of the month the Sevastopol occupiers “flooded” the reservoir to 93% of its designed capacity and were in no hurry to release water. When they supposedly received a storm warning from Simferopol on the eve of a sharp warming on January 18, they began dumping but too late and too much. According to Okhrimenko, this discharge flow on the night of January 19 below the reservoir “entered into resonance” with the Chernaya tributaries “revived” from the rapid melting of snow, and this is what led to a large-scale natural disaster.
Residents of Sevastopol write on this occasion that this version, in contrast to Razvozhaev’s stories about “awakened springs,” is as “meaningful and convincing” as possible. It is stated that “there were and are not any sane, convincing options for the cause of the flood in the valley of the Chernaya River, except for the discharge of an excessive amount of water from the Chernorechenske Reservoir. Apparently, they did not want to miss out on the water that was available, because they do not know: there will still be enough precipitation to ensure cities with a rapidly growing population” of Russian colonialists.
The townspeople also write that “the given figures confirm the version of an artificial flood caused by the release of water, and this is sabotage”. It is obvious that the Aksyonov clan not only contributed to the media coverage of this, frankly speaking, well-established version, but also hastily provided it to the Kremlin as part of its “warm greetings” to Razvozhaev’s group.
