On December 30, we wrote about the occupiers’ statement that Crimean residents would allegedly “be paid more than 3 billion rubles for damage from the hurricane” on November 26, highlighting a number of “interesting details” of such “unthinkable generosity.” Since the “basic amount of payments” was determined to be “as much as” 10 thousand rubles, it was assumed that they would cost 300 thousand dead souls; we noted that this figure is quite large and, naturally, cannot be verified by anyone: the occupiers will “prudently” hide all the “registers” locally.
At the same time, the collaborators stated that “540 thousand Crimeans applied for compensation for damage from the storm,” and that “payments will be accrued until February 15,” and 77 thousand Crimean residents allegedly “already received” them; and who these “lucky ones” were, of course, was not reported. We wrote that the “inconsistency” between the number of applications and the “expected funds” worries the collaborators least of all: as is obvious, the “extra” dead souls will definitely not complain anywhere.
On January 10, our version was “confirmed” by the criminal “head of Crimea”, saying that “according to updated data, about 495 thousand Crimean inhabitants submitted applications,” but only “195 thousand” were “included in the database,” and only 120 thousand of them allegedly “will receive payments in the near future,” since the occupiers even “formed” some kind of “application.”
It is obvious that for some reason the collaborators decided to reduce the scale of the scam to 2 billion, most likely due to the limit on the total amount intended for theft; the number of “lucky recipients” of 10 thousand will include mainly “officials” and other “loyal businessmen” who will not complain anywhere about the “help that did not arrive”.
At the same time, the “Crimean authorities” massively deny this “compensation” to “mere mortals”; Aksyonov himself let it slip, pointing out that he alone allegedly received “607 appeals from Crimean inhabitants who were denied payment for one reason or another,” then “clarifying” the number to a thousand. This means that there are actually at least tens of thousands of such “lucky” ones; For them, Gauleiter demanded that “explanatory work” be carried out in the classic style of “there is no money but you hold on.”
At the same time, Aksyonov also hinted regarding the destroyed coastal infrastructure that “by the beginning of the active holiday season, it will not be possible to complete repairs in full,” although, naturally, the scale of write-offs of funds for “already allocated contractors” is impressive. In this context, not only the mention of a certain “active holiday season” is tragicomic, but also the fact that the Gauleier reported about certain “territories in which restrictions will apply,” which will clearly give the population “special pleasure.”
