We previously reported that a propaganda campaign continues in the occupied Crimea with announcements of illegal “issuance of land plots” to Crimean participants in Russian aggression.
On April 5, Russian occupiers, represented by the servants of the criminal “head of Crimea,” stated that this criminal process allegedly “is about to begin” for 700 land parcels, in the Chernomorsky and Saksky districts of the occupied region. At the same time, it is stated that the filing procedures are supposedly “as simplified as possible” and that supposedly “plots will be distributed automatically”.
In social networks, the relatives of the already held and perspective “cargo 200” and “cargo 300” from the aggressor have somewhat different information.
Even if we do not take into account the lamentations of the wives of the servants of the aggressor in the Eastern and Southern Crimea, who do not understand why they need a piece of land without infrastructure on virgin lands, in an uninhabited area a hundred kilometers from their place of residence, as well as the curse of the “deprived” relatives of the aggressor’s soldiers from Russia itself, to whom “Crimean land” were not promised in principle, then the situation emerges as a characteristic one.
It is reported that the “reason” for “obtaining a plot” is a “certificate” from the aggressor’s “military unit”, which they predictably either do not give at all, or offer to “purchase” for a fairly considerable amount.
Also on April 5, the criminal “head of administration” of Yalta, Yanina Pavlenko, let slip for the propaganda of the invaders that the “first 46 applications for plots” in the city were submitted not to traitors from the aggressor’s army, but to collaborators from the criminal so-called “OMON” and “Rosguard”.
Also in social networks it is reported that even in the case of “allocation of a plot”, it will immediately be “buyed out” for a pittance by “investors” who are in a situation of “an offer that cannot be refused”, since for private residence and construction uninhabited land without a minimum infrastructure such as water and electricity is obviously unusable.
However, even such “vague prospects” for the ill-fated “land”, for obvious reasons, remain at the level of television broadcasts of the aggressor’s “Crimean” propaganda.
Let us recall that the proposals for the reintegration of the peninsula from the “Future of Crimea” forum, developed with the participation of our Association, indicate the need for a long moratorium on any real estate transactions after the de-occupation of the region in order to exclude all kinds of attempts to legalize land and real estate illegally “acquired” from the occupiers.
