As the aggressor-controlled “Feodosia media” wrote in the morning of August 21, allegedly the previous evening “an attack took place on the children’s camp “Fortuna” in Yevpatoria. Unknown people in masks broke into safes in the group leaders’ rooms, took money and valuables of vacationers and staff.”
It is stated that “money from group leaders, valuables of children, which were stored there, were stolen. The criminals did not disdain to take even more or less valuable clothes” and that “the attackers were wearing masks and armed with shivs.” At the same time, it is stated that allegedly “even the counselors do not have phones” and that “the information was reported by relatives of one of the vacationing children. They were called and told that the children would be evacuated. Where and what – is unclear. The camp was practically destroyed by the attackers.”
Let us note, that at least “destroying the camp” of four buildings, where a couple of hundred people were located, would be difficult, and hiding information about this – even more so.
This story about the “sinister attack” on the swimsuits and caps of the counselors, while “the children were at dinner”, looks, to put it mildly, critical, and therefore there are two main versions of what happened, which are closely connected with the activities of “Fortuna” in Yevpatorian Zaozerne settlement. This illegal “institution” was “re-shaped” by collaborators at one time through the “Breeze” Sailing School from Novoozerne, which is owned by the Autonomous Republic of Crimea.
This “republican structure”, which is “under the jurisdiction” of the occupiers’ “Ministry of education, science and youth”, is now headed by a “director” in the form of the Crimean Tatar collaborator Rustem Khalitov, who was “deputy head of the administration of the Saksky district” at least until 2020, with “special thanks” from gauleiter Aksyonov.
Khalitov’s “demotion” to the head of “Fortuna” actually gave him and his patrons access to a “good trough” – at least 300 million “budget funds” have been pumped through the camp recently under “state contracts”. And this has a corresponding “ideological cover”: this summer in “Fortuna”, under the auspices of the same “ministries” held militaristic sabbaths of the aggressor’s propaganda: “We are the descendants of the victors”, “We are the future of Crimea” and the so on.
Therefore, if the “attack” really took place, then it was clearly aimed not at the “well-worn” beach towels of the camp group leaders and animators, but at a “big pre-election greeting” to this corruption pyramid from the disenfranchised competitors: as they write to us from the localities, Khalipov’s arrival was perceived quite painfully by the “disenfranchised” local collaborators, who “have not forgotten anything”.
However, there is a simpler option – when “state money” disappears “somewhere” in the safe, then for the “councilors” there is nothing “easier” than to come up with an “evening story” about the insidious “bandits with shivs”. In the end, it is not much different in plausibility from the stories about the “greatness of the Russian world” performed by the same thieving personnel.
