On June 19, the aggressor’s propaganda announced the so-called “video bridge” Moscow – Simferopol – St. Petersburg – Yekaterinburg, “timed to coincide with the anniversary” of the beginning of the Soviet-Nazi war, at which the next book “Genocide of the Peoples of Russia. Crimes against the Soviet civilian population and prisoners of war in years of the Great Patriotic War.” The aggressor’s endless “victory vanity” his attempts to blur the category of genocide have long ceased to surprise. And the focus of the mentioned publication not so much on the events of the Second World War, but on the language of hatred towards ethnic Ukrainians as supposedly “historical accomplices” and “accomplices in the genocide of the peoples of Russia,” to put it mildly, is not new. In this entire pseudo-historical show, attention should be paid only to the statements of Yuri Nikiforov, a member of the scientific council of the Russian military historical society, an adviser to the department for coordinating public policy in the historical and humanitarian spheres of the administration of the Kremlin dictator, as well as the “literary slave” of the notorious plagiarist Vladimir Medinsky in his “imperishable books” such as “military history of Russia”. This far from random figure in Moscow stated on the “video bridge” that the main threat to “historical truth” is… artificial intelligence. Nikiforov told his Crimean collaborators that supposedly “artificial intelligence will simply generate a wave of fake historical publications. Such littering of the information environment with any materials poses an obvious threat. This is a form of ethnocide, that is, depriving the people of historical memory, replacing scientific knowledge with an absolutely unrealistic fake picture ideas about the past.” It is obvious here that such accusations from the “world behind the scenes” in the Kremlin propagandists’ “bird language” usually mean an announcement of their own actions, and of precisely this nature. Nikiforov does not particularly hide this, declaring “counteraction mechanisms,” naturally, in the field of “IT technologies,” since supposedly “it will be almost impossible to resist this … with human forces.” It is extremely likely that the aggressor decided to turn to artificial intelligence to create his own “alternative history” about the so-called “triune Russian people” from Nikiforov, covering it up with the need to “fight fakes” for a trivial reason. High-quality rewriting of history requires considerable intellect, the natural carriers of which are not at all easy to deal with in the Kremlin corridors, but the Moscow clan of the Nikiforovs and Medinskys is clearly not willing to outsource such an “important task” and, accordingly, share income and handouts with completely unrelated pseudo-historians intends, obviously artificial intelligence as an accomplice suits them to a greater extent.
