As we wrote earlier, the liberation by the Ukrainian Army of the right-bank Kherson region, including the regional center, caused a rather stormy and obviously panicky reaction of the Crimean collaborators, but at the same time, the criminal “leaders of the republic” Aksyonov and Konstantinov began to “keep a pause”.

However, on November 14, the fake “speaker” nevertheless “spoke out” on the Kherson issue, publishing a whole “program text” on his own behalf, and even without the traditionally large number of grammatical errors.

In this speech, prepared on behalf of Konstantinov, it was immediately stated that “what the strategic plan is” of the aggressor’s troops, he “does not know and should not know”, and at the same time it was indicated that the criminal plans to capture Odessa “should be postponed”.

But it’s not Konstantinov’s “calming mantras” that are noteworthy here, but his emphasis on the fact that “leaving Kherson is a military, not a political decision.” Thus, the criminal “speaker” seems to be “whitewashing” the Russian General Staff. But, on the other hand, it is “a little unclear” on whom the collaborator wants to “put the blame”, while at the same time citing in his “Munich speech” a “historical example” of a different “political decision”: namely, the USSR authorities to hold the defense of Kyiv in the autumn of 1941, which, as it is well-known, led to a large-scale defeat of the Red Army.

Also recognizing that “the front has approached the Crimea”, Konstantinov at the same time did not forget to once again talk about the “bankruptcy of the world order based on the hegemony of a single superpower” and that allegedly “the collapse of the American world is becoming more and more obvious”, and “the future belongs to us”.

However, such statements about fronts, “hegemonies” and a certain “future” on the part of the once swindler-developer, and now the key Nazi aggressor Konstantinov, are very reminiscent of not 1939 or 1941, but already 1945 in besieged Berlin.

Similar Posts