By mid-September, the occupiers decided to “officially please” the Crimeans with “innovations” in the activities of the schools under their control, and for some unknown purpose they chose the so-called “chairman of the state council committee on transport, housing-public utilities and road management”, collaborator Oksana Satsik, who has never worked in the educational sphere, as a “talking head”.
The “innovations” boil down to reducing the lessons of the “harmful” English language, introducing such a form of brainwashing as a “separate subject”, as “Spiritual and moral culture of Russia”, while preserving its previous propaganda analogue, the “mandatory weekly lesson” “Conversations about the Important”.
In addition, the collaborators boast about the introduction of mandatory “career guidance” from the fifth grade, the choice of which, naturally, no one will “trust” to pupils and their parents.
The occupiers also declared the use of the MAX messenger, which is completely under the control of the Russian punishers, “mandatory” in school chats and promise to introduce “behavior grades” as a form of repression of unwanted students.
However, the format of such assessment has not yet been detailed: it is obvious that the corresponding “Kremlin manuals” are now being actively “refined”.
All this propaganda show, instead of education, predictably leads to an “increase in the academic load” with “import substitution” of the actual subjects for the aforementioned forms of “ideological work” of the aggressor.
At the same time, the collaborators understand very well that the quality of education will be guaranteed to decrease from all the described measures, but for this they have a “creative means” in the form of “limiting the number of tests”, which will clearly allow school “administrations” to report on fake “educational results”.
Let us recall that the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights at its 78th session, among the violations of human rights in the occupied territories of Ukraine, paid special attention to the aggressor’s encroachments on educational rights.
