Earlier, we have repeatedly written about cases of “suddenly revealed” “political unreliability” of Crimean collaborators by the aggressor’s punishers and propaganda, against those, who had previously become “scapegoats” and “weak links” of the aggressor’s corruption vertical, that is, defendants in “criminal cases”.
Basically, these seemed to be cases, from Yevpatoria to Kerch, publications about “Ukrainian passports” or “unpatriotic” relatives, such as the recent example with the son of Svyatoslav Brusakov.
From the recently published in this vein, we will mention the “insider” with the conversation of Yevgeny Gorlov, described by us many times, leaked to social networks, now “sincerely admitting his guilt” in the Sevastopol “court” of the former “deputy” of the Gauleiter Mikhail Razvozhaev.
Since it was rather difficult to find a “Ukrainian passport” for this Sochi swindler, now they are charging him “for a tracksuit”.
Allegedly, when he was “vice-governor”, Gorlov refused to purchase two tracksuits for some “volunteers” for the “contract soldiers” of the aggressor in the Sevastopol hospital, stating that the latter’s “income is three times greater” than his own.
But in this context, the case of another functionary of the occupiers, a local Sevastopol collaborator Oleg Borisov, the so-called “head of the department of legal support and contractual work” in the “Leninsky district administration”, stood out.
Before the occupation, this figure owned the law firm “Yurikom Privacy” in Sevastopol, and did not particularly “shine” in the public sphere for the aggressor, having been in his “position” since at least 2019, when he won a certain “competition” in the nomination “Municipal employee – 2019”.
And now, quite suddenly, a number of “drain tanks” published “teeth-shattering incriminating evidence” about this collaborator.
Allegedly, Borisov “was friends with Oksana Senedzhuk”, an employee of the so-called “research and design institute of urban development, architecture, research and environment”, who was repressed by the occupiers for 15 years in 2024 for allegedly “cooperating with Ukrainian authorities”.
Also allegedly, Borisov posted a video on social networks about how “Russia can be governed for up to a hundred years”, allegedly called someone “Putin’s scum” and also committed such “horrible crimes” as publishing his middle-aged body smeared with Crimean mud “under a woman’s swimsuit”, his photos from drinking parties, although clothed, and the like.
All this, from the scum to the bathing suit, was summed up by propagandists as “espionage”, obviously “especially carefully concealed”, and literally a couple of days later the illegal “head of the Leninsky district” Alexey Vereshchaka, hastily calling journalists together, announced the “dismissal” of Borisov “in connection with the loss of trust”, for “discrediting the Russian Federation”.
This situation somewhat goes beyond the general kaleidoscope of repressions, since earlier the “drain tanks” of the occupiers, like the “Crimean Smersh” either simply voiced the tasks sent to them by the aggressor’s punishers on already “ready-made cases”, or identified and handed over to the punishers people sympathetic to Ukraine, manifested somewhat differently than “stockings” made of mud in a photo or dancing with a bottle at a “corporate party”.
In addition, the punishers received information from such “initiators” about the future victim before his publications and first gave it the corresponding “sanction”.
And in the case of Borisov, sitting in the most “lucrative chair”, through which many financial streams pass, it became clear that it is enough to simply organize a post about the “Ukrainian spy”, publish any stupid photo of him from social networks, and then this “word and deed fpr the tsar’s safety” will begin to “live its own life”.
It is obvious that now the repressions against the hapless corrupt official will not be limited to “dismissal”, and the punishers for the first time clearly read about the “sins” of this “saboteur” from the “press” and are now hastily improvising with a “response”.
And therefore now many Sevastopol collaborators from among the corrupt “officials” are gossiping that “the tail has begun to wag the dog”, and that, even without having “any problems” with the punishers of the aggressor, they can now get them “out of the blue”, if competitors simply post some rumors about their “secret intentions” on the Internet.
Who will be next recorded in Sevastopol as “Ukrainian saboteurs” in the fight for access to the trough – further events will show.
