Let us recall, that earlier we covered the collapse of the occupiers’ attempts to transfer the occupied peninsula to “financial self-sufficiency” until 2027, which led to the extension of the “target program” until 2030, but in a “lighter version”, creating an annual “hole” of at least one hundred billion rubles for the current “truncated republican budget”.
This issue is quite painful for the aggressor’s propaganda, and therefore stories about “improving taxation” do not disappear from its feeds. However, these “optimistic news” themselves are quite typical, which was demonstrated by the next “optimistic report” on the mid-July meeting of “tax officials” and functionaries of the illegal “state council” of the occupiers.
The formal cause was a report on the results of the first half of the year of the aggressor’s implementation of a “new initiative,” namely, an “automated simplified taxation system.” However, from the remains of the Crimean business in 2025, they decided to “automate” “as many as “183 Crimean taxpayers”, which allegedly gave the “republican budget” such a “fantastic figure” as two million rubles.
And therefore, the collaborators place more hopes on such new “taxes” as 2% on “unfinished construction projects” and 1% on “residential premises and buildings, apartment buildings, rental and garden houses, garages and parking spaces”, having sharply increased their “book value” in the “registers” in advance.
They are also trying to increase the “tax” pressure against Crimean inhabitants who have trucks registered to them.
However, it is obvious that these “additional incentives” for the Crimean population, mainly leading to the liquidation of “enterprises”, will not give not only a hundred, but also tens of billions of “additional revenues”.
And the “target audience” of these “optimistic news” in the form of Kremlin fiscal functionaries will clearly not revise the figures of “subventions” to increase: it is well known that in the current conditions of the financial crisis, the increase of the “military share of the budget” and the fall of the aggressor’s export income, they will not retreat from the principle of “there is no money, but you hold on”, even if they suddenly really wanted to.
