We have previously written many times about the clumsy attempts of the Crimean gauleiter Sergei Aksyonov to “master” a certain “personalized combat Crimean unit”, as well as about the unsuccessful attempts of Russian propaganda to “praise the heroism of the Crimeans” in the ranks of the aggressor army.
After the “exchange of pleasantries” between the “battalions” “Crimea” and “Tavrida” that we described some days ago, in which, apart from the names, very little and few relate to the peninsula, the “election propaganda”, loyal to Aksyonov, decided, apparently in the context of hopelessness, to remember the fake “people’s militia brigade”.
From Moscow, “information reasons” began to be thrown in by the “Crimean Duma deputy”, an old accomplice of the Crimean gauleiter, Mikhail Sheremet, with statements about “warrants from the Crimean people’s militia to capture” either certain Ukrainian diplomats or Vladimir Zelensky.
However, it turned out to be much more difficult to “find and assemble” the “people’s militia” itself for the “friendly” Aksyonov propaganda, than the aforementioned Ukrainian officials, since even for the appropriate picture for a photo shoot in the “frontline” Yalta “against the backdrop” of Yanina Pavlenko, so they had to attract “both young and old”, hastily dressing him in camouflage.
Against this background, the June statements of the same propaganda about some “Aksyonovites” as a “mobile, proactive, well-coordinated detachment, not tied to the area”, who allegedly “constantly move along the line of combat contact and interact with other units”, look tragicomic.
At that time we wrote that the “veterans of the people’s militia”, who had been “repeatedly awarded” and had been working on the role of extras for the aggressor’s propaganda until 2022, did not go to the front in their masses, preferring to “forge a strong rear” of their personal well-being.
Among other things, after “persistent recommendations” from Aksyonov’s clan to “stay near the ribbon” at least until the “September elections”, these “militiamen” decided to respond to him, in the traditional style of “rebellion on the knees” and “collective appeals”, by organizing a “gathering” in Yevpatoria, at which they declared that they were “not a formation of fighters, but first of all a unity of warriors of the spirit”.
These “warriors of the spirit” in the summer “with all their hearts” agreed to “deliver provisions” and “cook dinners”, and, naturally, not at the front, but in the Crimean “resort area”.
That is why even at the current Yalta gathering of “hero militiamen” Aksyonov was now able to tell that “members of the republic’s people’s militia brigade” receive “state awards” for allegedly “making trips … to provide humanitarian aid to military personnel” and “carrying out other special tasks”, though not at the front, but in Crimea.
However, as they gossip in the Simferopol “corridors of power”, if Aksyonov wanted to impress one of his Moscow curators and overseers with the aforementioned “grimaces and jumps” with the “people’s militia”, then he achieved the exact opposite result.
