Some days ago, the “independent blogger” controlled by the Russian military, Eyvaz Umerov, decided to “get a little distracted” from the endless “fight against traitors” in the FSB-controlled “Crimean muftiate”. So, in addition to the “blatant exposure” of the son-in-law of the “mufti”, Ametkhan Tyncherov, in an inexpensively purchased diploma of higher education at the Kazan Innovative University, Umerov decided to “tightly deal with France”.
The fact is that the other day the French authorities publicly supported the idea of a special international tribunal for the trial of those responsible for Russian aggression. And although today the concept of this court is only being discussed by the heads of state of the world, and a draft of the corresponding resolution is being prepared in the UN General Assembly, the aggressor reacts to this process predictably painfully.
Crimean collaborators in general, like their Russian “colleagues”, did not come up with anything better than hiding behind long-obsolete narratives of the II World War, and “sneaking” at France in the spirit of the old historical anecdote about the Nazi Keitel, who allegedly signed a surrender in 1945 and when he saw the French generals there, he allegedly said “How?! And they defeated us too?!” However, this myth was invented by Soviet propaganda, and in fact, of course, no one said this, although the current comparison by Russian propagandists themselves of the Putin regime with a capitulating Nazi field marshal is symbolic.
However, Umerov’s curators decided to “distinguish themselves” and their “talking head” issued a whole criminal “action plan”. Not forgetting to repeat the mentioned fake that the French allegedly “thanks to Stalin … are listed as winners in the II World War”, this fake “Crimean Tatar activist” stated that allegedly in the “XXI century, the French military, in most cases with the knowledge of the government, committed a huge number of war crimes in African countries” and allegedly “were part of the international forces that attacked Afghanistan.”
Assessing this “stuffing” from the aggressor’s military intelligence client, one should not forget either about the terrorist characteristics of the Russian regime or its ties with a number of African dictatorships. It is obvious that the Kremlin has chosen Africa as a “battlefield” with the francophone global space and is now directly putting forward the appropriate threats through the “Crimean talking heads”.
