On January 6, aggressor-controlled environmentalists, Georgy Kavanosyan and Alexey Knizhnikov, published a satellite image for Sunday, which shows coastal film pollution with oil products in the Sevastopol area – from Kacha to the Khersones lighthouse, as well as in the Balaklava Bay area, and practically throughout this entire area, oil spills are visible at a short distance from the shore.
These environmentalists wrote that “new emissions into the city are possible” and that “since the fuel oil was carried by the main Black Sea current to Sevastopol, it is in the Sevastopol area that serious emissions onto the coast can be expected, because there is a stable anticyclonic circulation in the sea there”, since the current there by sea from east to west carries fuel oil, and the local vortex in the sea drives it back, to the northeast, to the coast”, and therefore “there will be trouble in Sevastopol”.
Against this background, a tragicomedy is unfolding in Sevastopol social networks with “Sevastopol volunteers”, who predictably stated that no one is giving them any of the promised equipment for cleaning the beaches.
In response, the channels controlled by gauleiter Razvozhaev came up with the idea of massively accusing “strange activists” of all mortal sins, stating that “there is nothing worse than an unauthorized solution to problems”, that “those who are engaged in cleaning on their own – they ruin the statistics and harm the environmentalists”, that people interfere with the “official headquarters that keeps statistics on pollution”, having quickly found in the “volunteers” both a “Ukrainian trace” and some connection with the scapegoat and former deputy of Razvozhaev, Yevgeny Gorlov, who is sitting in a Moscow pretrial detention center.
The situation with the Sevastopol seabird is also filled with tragicomedy, earlier we wrote that the “authorities” entrusted its collection not to the “veterinary service”, but to the “Sevastopol forestry”. But when it became too obvious that the foresters would not clean anyone in principle and could only “bury biowaste”, the occupiers deigned to declare that the “city veterinary” on Mogilevskaya Street also accepts “victims of pollution”.
As they wrote on social networks about this, “Mogilevskaya invites volunteers to calm down, and the further fate of the birds is unknown”, “nobody keeps statistics” and states “imitation of vigorous activity”. As it turned out, these “veterinarians” simply store the oiled birds brought by the population in closed boxes, after which they only deal with those few that miraculously survive from such “service”.
