Over the past week, Crimean residents on social networks have been mocking the “dog case” that has become “viral” due to the specific nature of the absurd response of punitive forces to a banal domestic incident. The plot of the story itself was, to put it mildly, prosaic. On January 18, at the aggressor-controlled “Simeiz secondary school”, a physical education lesson was being held on the street sports ground, and a neighbor’s pet dog ran into it through a hole in the fence and grabbed part of the equipment, namely a “sports plastic cone.”
The teacher demanded that the students return the “prey” and during the “battle for the cone”, the animal, captured by two schoolchildren, bit one of the “fighters for the equipment” in the leg and stomach, however, without any particular bodily harm. This unassuming story from the Yalta village hit social networks, and then the head of the Investigative Committee of the aggressor, Alexander Bastrykin, suddenly became “excited” about it, personally instructing his criminal “Crimean subordinate” Vladimir Terentyev to “initiate a criminal case.”
As even the occupiers-controlled “media” by the timidly note, in the last week of January alone, 27 cases of animal attacks on humans were recorded in the Crimea, often with a much less comical plot and with more obvious signs of carelessness of both the owners and the “authorities.” Therefore, it is not surprising that the case chosen by Bastrykin for the next “self-PR” in the role of “savior of the disadvantaged” caused a truly tsunami of sarcasm.
This situation especially contrasts with the silence of Bastrykin and his “flock of comrades” regarding the recent bloody “sumo fight” as a result of the drinking of criminal “investigative committee workers” in that very occupied Yalta. Crimeans are keenly interested in this matter: “When will the dog be tried? Will there be an open trial?” and they predict that the occupiers’ punishers owill “confiscate the fence with the hole, the booth and the owner’s house, so as not to have to get up twice.”
Regarding the school, residents of the occupied peninsula sarcastically “suggest” “urgent modernization, with barbed wire, electricity, towers along the perimeter with floodlights… in the spirit of the times and a candidate again…”, hinting at the tragicomic farce of “Putin’s re-elections.” And, as the residents of Kerch sarcastically “sympathize” with the Bastrykin-subordinated punishers, “it’s more difficult with dogs than with homos… they are not forbidden to bark…”.
