The other day, the Kremlin announced the start of another “spring conscription campaign”, again criminally extending it to the occupied Crimea.
Earlier it was reported about the “not happy” reports of the criminal aggressor’s “military commissars” on the peninsula regarding the “non-fulfillment of plans” for the procurement of cannon fodder in the “autumn conscription”, and in certain regions of Crimea, for example, in Yalta and Bakhchisarai, the “shortage” was more than a third.
Obviously wanting to “correct the situation” on March 31, the representative of the aggressor’s General Staff Vladimir Tsimlyansky said that “the employees of the military commissariats were given the task in preparation for the spring conscription campaign, which begins on April 1, to alert citizens electronically”, referring to the “State Services” (“Gosuslugi”) website.
It is predictable that after such an announcement, both in Russia and in the Russia-occupied territory, thousands of people tried to immediately delete accounts on this “Gosuslugi” site.
At the same time, the obvious inconsistency of Tsimlyansky’s statements even with the criminal norms of the aggressor’s legislation, according to which “the summonses must be on paper”, worried everyone rather weakly, since the fact that for the Kremlin there are no written rules in principle does not constitute a special secret.
However, it was the massive and instantaneous outflow of users from “Gosuslugi” that became an unpleasant surprise for the aggressor, for which the Kremlin was clearly not ready.
Even collaborator Oleg Tsarev, commenting on this situation, was forced to admit that “there will be no responsibility for ignoring electronic summonses”, and that “it’s not about the laws” that “can be changed”, but “that the introduction of a rule on liability for failure to appear by electronic agenda means to say goodbye to the “Gosuslugi” portal. Despite the fact that the effect of electronic agendas still will not give.
Indeed, already on the morning of April 1, the aggressor decided to “hang up the situation” and through a number of “officials” announced that “no summons would be distributed through the “Gosuslugi””. Such “confusion” from the aggressor indicates that in the occupied Crimea the criminal “conscription” will clearly pass “with a twinkle”.
