On December 5, Crimean collaborators announced “new members of the republic’s civic chamber”, and since this structure is a weighty segment of the occupiers’ propaganda, an analysis of the personalities of its new “talking heads” will not be superfluous.
Two “first-timers” were brought into the “chamber” “under the quota” of the Crimean gauleiter Sergei Aksyonov, and given his chronic “lame duck” regime, the characters there turned out to be appropriate.
For example, this is the Simferopol “businessman with Armenian roots” Grigory Aleksanyan, who is also the author of “love stories and children’s fairy tales” dedicated mainly to the “charms of the Russian world” under the pseudonym Gregory Yan.
In addition to this graphomaniac, Aksyonov sent former criminal law teacher Nikolai Gorbunov to the “ward” to engage in “fairy tale therapy”, who in 2015 unsuccessfully decided to conduct a “workshop” on corruption articles based on “personal experience”.
Further, Gorbunov was listed by the occupiers as the “director of the first in the republic … interactive museum of knowledge and discoveries” “Znanium”, that is, a “professional social activist” and a member of all sorts of “councils”, in 2018 receiving a “certificate” from the curators for “assistance in organizing and conducting” such a criminal show as “Kalashnikov Quest”.
Unlike Aksyonov, the two characters according to the “Konstantinov quota” look “well-fed”, and it is obvious that they were “delegated by the state council” with the “long-term aim” of the old schemer and his curators.
This is the old “flower from the heart herbarium” of the aforementioned swindler, Valentina Radzivil, who made a career at “Privatbank” before the occupation, and over the past decade “grew” to “vice president” at the “key Crimean bank”, “RNKB”.
Another “chick of the speaker’s nest” was Leonid Rudyakov, a career employee of the aggressor’s special services, “exposed” since 2019 under the cover of a number of “positions” at the “Crimean republican institute of postgraduate pedagogical education”, that is, in the institution responsible for the “re-education” of teachers in the occupied territory.
Well, the “chamber” itself acquired another characteristic character, Mikhail Strelnikov from the Simferopol district, formally “delegated” from the “district public council”, where he was the “head”. But earlier this same “social activist” was sent to that very “district council” according to its “quota” by the “chamber” itself.
This “Strelnikov cycle” is explained simply: in fact, this collaborator has long and tightly managed such a “bread and butter” trough as the district “municipal state institution” “Administrative-Economic Center”, sawing off “budgets” for “improvement”.
Strelnikov is also connected with a number of developers and with the “local” driving school mafia, and therefore his “social activity” will clearly add tragicomic elements to the “chamber”.

Similar Posts