On the tragic date of memory of the victims of the genocide of the Crimean Tatar people, the occupiers and Crimean collaborators did not fail to carry out yet another provocation.
The day before, activists of the Crimean Tatar people, including the leadership of local Mejlises, criminally “banned” by the occupiers, despite the requirements of the International Court of Justice, received from the aggressor’s punishers criminal “warnings” in which they “reminded of responsibility” for “holding uncoordinated mass actions”. Let us recall that on this day, until 2014, actions dedicated to the victims of the genocide were held throughout Crimea, with participation of thousands.
At the same time, the occupants themselves organized a cynical “action” today in the Bakhchisarai district, and it is obvious that there the Crimean Tatars, in addition to “carefully selected” collaborators, were “useless” to them.
The criminal “head of Crimea’ cynically stated today on this occasion that “collective responsibility is unacceptable, that the whole people cannot be held responsible for the actions of specific persons”, mentioning, nevertheless, some “criminals”, obviously not referring to Stalin’s punishers.
Thus, the collaborators develop Stalin’s propaganda that allegedly the Crimean Tatars were deported for “acts of cooperation with the invaders”, although in fact, as historians have long proven, it was just and mostly completely different people who collaborated with the Nazis in Crimea. At the same time, the speeches from collaborator Aksyonov about “criminal collaborators” mean that he probably has not looked in the mirror for a long time.
Also, both Aksyonov and the criminal Vladimir Konstantinov, who today nevertheless called deportation a crime through his teeth, are directly lying that allegedly “in Russia it has been given an exhaustive political, legal and moral assessment”. As it is known, all political and legal decisions condemning deportation were made either before the collapse of the USSR in the last years of its existence, or by independent Ukraine and, later by third countries, but not by the aggressor.
Moreover, the occupiers either destroyed or “safely hid” the materials that were collected in Crimea before its occupation by the Security Service of Ukraine for the relevant criminal proceedings, which extremely complicated its further, still ongoing investigation by Ukrainian law enforcement officers under the “genocide” article.
