Earlier in January, we wrote about leaks from aggressor-controlled “anonymous channels”about the unsavory activities of the Sevastopol “government,” with the “systemic link” of these large-scale corruption schemes with the “Onexim Group” of the Russian “oligarch-relocant” Mikhail Prokhorov.
Svetlana Pirogova, the “deputy” of the Sevastopol gauleiter, was named Prokhorov’s “main puppet,” allegedly “without whose approval and decision nothing has happened in Sevastopol for a long time.”
Meanwhile, gauleiter Razvozhaev was practically declared a puppet of Pirogova,
and the role of Prokhorov’s structures in the careers of a number of local swindlers was highlighted.
The “candor session” revolved around the activities of Konstantin Pirogov, a relative of the aforementioned defendant, at the infamous “Sevastopolstroyproekt”, as well as the activities of his former partner, Alina Barvitskaya, in laundering approximately 900 million rubles of “budget” money through the “Social developer Temprano” structure.
Yuri Baranov, the former “CEO of the Sevastopol Seaport” and current “talking head” at the “state enterprise” “Balaklava Development Project”:, was also linked to Prokhorov’s interests.
Alexander Podturkin, previously described by us, was also linked to Prokhorov’s “Civic Platform.” He was allegedly “appointed” to Sevastopolgaz by Pirogova,
and has now become the “head of the utility payments operator” “Digital Innovations”.
Pirogova’s commercial interests have now been declared in the “Sevastopol unified city card,” which has processed all “cashless payments for public transportation” in recent years.
We reported that, given Prokhorov’s potential “disfavor” in the Kremlin, occupier groups are seeking to exploit her influence to purge Sevastopol’s “feeding troughs” of competitors linked to the “toxic” oligarch.
Now, newly published “exposés” reveal that Pirogova’s clan has allegedly developed “systemic problems” with the group of “first vice-governor” Alexei Parikin.
And while Pirogova is now accused of “politically toxic ties” to Prokhorov,
then Parikin’s “unreliability” is traced to his ties to the “Ukrainian legacy” of oligarch Pavel Lebedev.
Parikin is also allegedly connected to the family of former Deputy Head of the Sevastopol State Administration, Dmitry Baziv, whose relative, Nikita Baziv, became the “CEO” of the “Sevastopol Development Corporation” under the occupiers.
Judging by the intensity of the bilateral “war of compromising evidence” between the Pirogov and Parikin factions, both sides in this “conflict within a noble family” in the context of an ever-shrinking corruption trough in impoverished Sevastopol, have concluded that “Bolivar cannot carry double.”
